Case 4107543/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107543/2019 Mr D McCallion v Co-Op Funeralcare — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107543/2019
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107543/2019 Mr D McCallion
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D McCallion brought complaints under section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974, and the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 against Co-Op Funeralcare. The judgment records that these complaints were withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the complaints had been withdrawn, the Employment Judge dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any findings on the merits of the complaints and contains no award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under the Health & Safety at Work Act 1974; withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Complaint under the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999; withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.