Case 4107555/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v A Kilna Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4107555/2017
- Decision date
- 29 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the claim for unlawful deductions from wages succeeded insofar as it related to untaken entitlement to contractual holiday pay. It ordered the respondent, A Kilna Ltd, to pay the claimant, Miss E Adams, compensation in the sum of £1,982.91 gross.
The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing and that no written reasons were requested. It also states that the remaining claim for breach of contract, relating to payments in respect of professional indemnity insurance, was adjourned and sisted for 6 weeks, so no final determination is recorded for that claim in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claim succeeded in respect of untaken entitlement to contractual holiday pay and ordered payment of £1,982.91 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,983 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,983
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,983
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.