Case 4107555/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Marshall v Smashed Patties (Greenock) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107555/2024
- Decision date
- 23 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was determined under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because no response had been presented by the respondent. On the available material, Employment Judge S MacLean found that Smashed Patties (Greenock) Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms L Marshall's wages and ordered payment of £1,029.60 gross, calculated as 90 hours at £11.44 per hour.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £116.69 gross, calculated as 10.2 hours at £11.44 per hour. The judgment does not record any separate award of interest or any other remedy beyond those two sums.
The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is therefore £1,146.29 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as the gross sum for 90 hours at £11.44 per hour. | Upheld | — | £1,030 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as the gross sum for 10.2 hours at £11.44 per hour; the judgment describes this as failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £117 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,146
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.