Case 4107571/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Khan v Represented by: Ms M Khan D Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107571/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ronald Mackay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by CVP on 17 June 2021 before Employment Judge Ronald Mackay. The tribunal held that the claims directed against the Second Respondent, Mr S Gill, were misconceived and dismissed them against him.
As against the First Respondent, D53 Limited, the Claimant succeeded in three monetary claims: notice pay of £2,750, unpaid holiday pay of £2,800, and a redundancy payment of £4,125. The judgment states that the sums awarded were gross of tax and national insurance, and that the First Respondent was responsible for making any lawful deductions from the notice pay and holiday pay awards to account to HMRC.
The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and it does not set out fuller written reasons beyond the disposals and payment order.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded against the First Respondent; the claims directed against the Second Respondent were dismissed as misconceived. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,675
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.