Mr A Moir v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019

Case reference: 4107593/2019
Decision date: 28 October 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge R Gall
Venue: Glasgow

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr A Moir

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. It also found that the claimant had failed to comply with an Order issued on 6 August 2019 requiring him to provide details of the remedy sought.

The reasons record that no information or contact had been received from the claimant after the Order, and that he had not responded to Tribunal letters dated 30 August and 2 October. The claimant was given until 22 October 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to give an acceptable reason or request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment identifies the claim as struck out under rule 37. The supplied listing category identifies the claim as unfair dismissal, but the judgment text itself gives no further substantive description of the underlying claim.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.