Case 4107600/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Held in Glasgow on May 2018 (Preliminary Hearing) D Mr C o n o r Morgan v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 4107600/2017
- Decision date
- 30 May 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Held in Glasgow on May 2018 (Preliminary Hearing) D Mr C o n o r Morgan
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing on time bar listed for 25 May 2018. The claimant did not attend and was not represented, but the tribunal had before it emails from his representative, Thomas Smith, saying that the applicant wished to withdraw the complete claim. The tribunal also heard oral submissions from the respondents' solicitor, Ms Eleanor Mannion, and proceeded in the claimant's absence under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal recorded the claimant's withdrawal under Rule 51 and then granted the respondents' oral application for a dismissal judgment under Rule 52. It held that there was no good cause not to dismiss the claim, because the claimant had not reserved any right to bring a further claim and the tribunal was not persuaded that a dismissal would be contrary to the interests of justice.
The dismissal order covered the claimant's complaints of wrongful dismissal and breach of contract arising from the termination of his employment as a support assistant on 24 August 2017. The tribunal noted that the effect of the Rule 52 dismissal was that the claimant may not commence a further claim against the respondents raising the same or substantially the same complaints. No award of expenses was made, because the respondents indicated that they did not intend to seek costs.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The complaint of wrongful dismissal was withdrawn by the claimant before the hearing and was then dismissed under Rule 52 after the tribunal refused to reserve any right to bring the same or substantially the same complaint again. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract complaint arising from termination of employment was withdrawn by the claimant and disposed of together with the wrongful dismissal complaint in the tribunal's Rule 52 dismissal judgment. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.