Case 4107622/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v J&A Anderson Roofing Services (Scotland) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107622/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Mr S Anderson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered J&A Anderson Roofing Services (Scotland) Ltd to pay damages of £2,960, said to be 8 weeks' pay. The judgment also recorded that the claimant had been employed for 8 years.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,145. That amount was calculated by reference to the claimant's length of service of 8 years, age of 42, and weekly wage of £370 at the date employment ended. The hearing listed for 12 February 2021 was cancelled. The total award recorded by the judgment is £6,105.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,960, described as 8 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,960 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,145, calculated by reference to length of service, age and weekly wage at termination. | Upheld | — | £3,145 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,105
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.