Case 4107628/2015 · Employment Tribunal
L Doherty Miss Beata Romecka v Represented by:- Ms Cunningham – Trainee Solicitor Caledonian Backpackers Hostel and 1 other — 2017
- Case reference
- 4107628/2015
- Decision date
- 17 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
3 namedClaimant
L Doherty Miss Beata Romecka
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment does not decide the merits of any employment claim. It records only two procedural outcomes in relation to applications made in the proceedings.
The tribunal held that the application under Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was incompetent. It also refused the application under Rule 70 of those Regulations.
No liability finding, compensation award, or other remedy is recorded in the judgment. The document is limited to the procedural ruling and the date of judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the application under Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was held to be incompetent. It does not determine a substantive tribunal claim. | Other | — | — |
| Other | The judgment records that the application under Rule 70 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 was refused. It does not determine a substantive tribunal claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.