Case 4107629/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Beel v South Lanarkshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107629/2014
- Decision date
- 25 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Beel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, on 13 February 2019, the claimant was given until 27 February 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike-out should not be ordered and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out particulars of this claim; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out particulars of this claim; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.