Case 4107642/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Sutherland v Enterprise Managed Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107642/2013
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Sutherland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Glasgow, Employment Judge Robert Gall sitting alone, struck out Mr K Sutherland's claim against Enterprise Managed Services Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 11 September 2019 the claimant was given until 25 September 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that issue. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why a strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out. No remedy or monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued, but the judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.