Case 4107645/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Woods v Glen Property Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107645/2024
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Woods
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge S MacLean issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that Ms J Woods was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Glen Property Ltd to pay damages of £2,410.00.
The tribunal also found that Ms Woods was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,928.00. The judgment does not record any other claims, legal tests, or further remedy components beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,410.00. | Upheld | — | £2,410 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £1,928.00. | Upheld | — | £1,928 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,338
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.