Case 4107656/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Norton v Represented by:15 Mr S Gittins Counsel AGS Airports Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107656/2021
- Decision date
- 28 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Norton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held by CVP on 22 July 2021, Employment Judge A Strain considered Mr G Norton’s claim against AGS Airports Limited. The tribunal recorded that the claim was one of indirect age discrimination.
The tribunal held that the indirect age discrimination claim had been presented in time. It also found that the claimant had been employed by the respondent. The judgment records oral reasons given at the conclusion of the hearing, but it does not determine the substantive merits of the age discrimination complaint.
No monetary award was made in this judgment, and no remedy issues were decided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal held that the claim of indirect age discrimination had been presented in time and that the claimant was employed by the respondent. No liability decision or remedy was determined in this judgment. | Other | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.