Case 4107658/2021 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107658/20215 Held on November 2021 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr M Kubiak v Colin’s Tyres Limited t/a Colin’s Tyres — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107658/2021
- Decision date
- 22 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107658/20215 Held on November 2021 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr M Kubiak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 November 2021 before Employment Judge J M Hendry, Mr M Kubiak appeared in person and the respondent, Colin’s Tyres Limited t/a Colin’s Tyres, did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal allowed the ET1 to be amended to name the respondent as Colin’s Tyres Limited trading as Colin’s Tyres.
The tribunal made three monetary awards in the claimant’s favour. It ordered payment of £560 for accrued but unpaid wages and £404.60 for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. It also ordered payment of £1,680, described as three weeks’ wages, in respect of the respondent’s failure under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide the claimant with a written statement of terms and conditions of employment.
The total award recorded by the judgment is £2,644.60. No separate split beyond the individual awards is set out in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for accrued but unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £560 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £405 |
| Other | Award of three weeks' wages for failure under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to provide a written statement of terms and conditions of employment. | Upheld | — | £1,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,645
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.