Case 4107664/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107664/2013 & 4100279/2014 Mr WJ Smith v Pegasus Power And Communication Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4107664/2013
- Decision date
- 29 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107664/2013 & 4100279/2014 Mr WJ Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claims in case nos. 4107664/2013 and 4100279/2014 had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge Robert Gall dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not contain any substantive findings on the merits of the dispute and does not record any monetary award. The judgment was dated 29 November 2017 and entered in the register and copied to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause of action; the public listing identifies the case under Working Time Regulations. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.