Case 4107665/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107665/2019 Miss C Bisland v Angels Day Nursery Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107665/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107665/2019 Miss C Bisland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and Employment Judge Frances Eccles issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Miss C Bisland was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. Angels Day Nursery Ltd was ordered to pay notice damages of £1,880, calculated as 8 weeks at £235.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £245, calculated as 1 week at £245. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £970. The total of the sums ordered is £3,095.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice damages awarded for dismissal in breach of contract, calculated as 8 weeks x £235. | Upheld | — | £1,880 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded, calculated as 1 week x £245. | Upheld | — | £245 |
| Holiday pay | Award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £970 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,095
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.