Case 4107666/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107666/2019 Miss C Lewis v Angels Day Nursery Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107666/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107666/2019 Miss C Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of Miss C Lewis's claim was contested. Employment Judge Frances Eccles issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered Angels Day Nursery Ltd to pay notice damages of £1,234.96, calculated as 8 weeks at £154.37 per week. It also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £154.37, calculated as 1 week at £154.37.
The tribunal further found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £308.74. The judgment records awards totalling £1,698.07 and does not record interest or any separate compensatory, basic, or injury to feelings award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice damages awarded under a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. | Upheld | — | £1,235 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £154 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £309 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,698
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.