Case 4107675/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Samantha Wilson v Jackies Hair Salon — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107675/2020
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Bradley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Samantha Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Samantha Wilson worked for Jackies Hair Salon from 20 August 2018 as a hairdresser for 16 hours per week at £7.70 per hour. The tribunal found that the respondent’s holiday year was the calendar year, that the claimant was entitled to 28 days of paid leave in 2020, and that by 11 September 2020 she had taken no paid leave. The salon had closed on 23 March 2020, reopened on 15 July 2020, and closed again on 11 September 2020 because it could not continue to trade by reason of business debts.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted the claimant’s calculation and held that £512.00 was due for accrued and untaken leave at the effective date of termination. On redundancy, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed because the respondent ceased to carry on the business for which she had been employed, so she was dismissed by reason of redundancy within section 139(1)(a)(i) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that she had two complete years of service, was 23 years old, and had a gross weekly pay of £123.30, producing a statutory redundancy payment of £184.80.
On notice, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to two weeks' notice by virtue of her two years' service, that none was given, and that she was therefore entitled to damages of £262.40. The total amount awarded was £959.20. The tribunal also recorded that, in discussion with Ms Anderson, it was not likely that the respondent would be able to pay the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim succeeded for accrued and untaken holiday pay at the effective date of termination. The tribunal accepted the claimant's figure of £512.00. | Upheld | — | £512 |
| Redundancy | Claim succeeded because the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy when the respondent's business closed. The tribunal rejected the claimant's figure of £196.80 and awarded the statutory amount of £184.80. | Upheld | — | £185 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages for failure to give notice succeeded. The judgment also described this as wrongful dismissal damages, and awarded £262.40 for two weeks' notice. | Upheld | — | £262 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £959
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- Regulation 13A(3) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 16 Working Time Regulations 1998
- Regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.135(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.139(1)(a)(i) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86(1)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 3 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.