Case 4107677/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Virginia Sutters v Represented by Ms M Dalziel Solicitor Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107677/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Virginia Sutters
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdiction over the claimant's single unfair dismissal complaint. The tribunal heard no evidence. It found as fact, on the basis of the claimant's email of 19 February 2021, that she was at all material times an alien for the purposes of the relevant legislation.
The respondent argued that section 6 of the Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919 expressly prohibited the claimant's appointment to civil service employment and made the contract void ab initio. The tribunal accepted that section 6 was an express prohibition on the appointment of an alien to any office or employment in the Civil Service, and held that section 13 reinforced that prohibition by creating a criminal offence for contravention. It also treated the Aliens' Employment Act 1955 as part of the relevant statutory framework, noting that it recognises only limited exceptions that were not relevant on the facts found.
Applying that construction, the tribunal concluded that the contract between the parties was prohibited by statute and therefore there was no contract of employment within section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was not an employee of the respondent and did not have the statutory right not to be unfairly dismissed. The tribunal therefore held that it had no jurisdiction to determine the unfair dismissal claim, and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary jurisdiction issue only. The tribunal held the contract of employment was prohibited by statute and void from the start because the claimant was an alien, so she was not an employee for section 230 ERA 1996 purposes. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.6 Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919
- s.13 Aliens Restriction (Amendment) Act 1919
- s.1(1) Aliens' Employment Act 1955
- s.230 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Okedina v Chikale
- Phoenix General Insurance Co of Greece SA v Halvanon Insurance Co Ltd
- Re Colgan and Others
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.