Case 4107699/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Member J Burnett Tribunal Member W Canning Mr D Hiddleston v Highland Country Buses — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107699/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Panel members
- J Burnett, W Canning
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member J Burnett Tribunal Member W Canning Mr D Hiddleston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Douglas Hiddleston, worked for Highland Country Buses Limited as a shift mechanic and was sent to the Kirkwall depot in Orkney in July 2020. On 15 July 2020 he told Ali Jack that the wrong grade of oil had been used in buses at the depot, that he believed this had caused damage to gearboxes and other components, and that it could affect braking systems. The tribunal accepted that he had a reasonable belief that the circumstances were harmful or potentially harmful to health or safety, and that it was not reasonably practicable for him to raise the matter through the safety representative because he had received no induction at Kirkwall and did not know who the representative was.
The tribunal also accepted that the claimant made a qualifying disclosure in the public interest for the purposes of s.43B ERA 1996. It found that, in the context of public transport, his concerns were sufficiently clear to amount to a disclosure tending to show that health or safety had been endangered. However, the tribunal was not persuaded that the reason or principal reason for dismissal was the raising of those concerns. It recorded serious criticisms of the respondent's handling of the grievance and disciplinary process, including the failure to pass the formal grievance letter to the grievance investigator and the failure to interview key witnesses, but it found that these procedural failings did not establish that the dismissal reason was whistleblowing or health and safety activity.
Instead, the tribunal accepted the evidence of the dismissing and appeal managers that the claimant was dismissed because they believed he had used threatening or at least highly insubordinate language towards Mr Willis on 17 July 2020. It noted that the dismissal letter referred to threatening behaviour towards another employee, and that the appeal outcome was based on the claimant's admitted words. The tribunal therefore dismissed both the s.100 health and safety dismissal claim and the s.103A protected disclosure claim, and no remedy arose.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.100(1)(c) ERA 1996 based on alleged health and safety disclosures. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Automatic unfair dismissal claim under s.103A ERA 1996 based on alleged protected disclosure under s.43B ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.100(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.43B ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- Kerr v Nathan's Wastesavers Ltd
- Kilraine v Wandsworth London Borough Council
- Chesterton Global Ltd v Nurmohamed
- Kuzel v Roche Products Ltd
- Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.