Case 4107703/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A McCulloch v Represented by:15 Mr B Thornber Thornber HR Law Watch US Grow — 2022
- Case reference
- 4107703/2021
- Decision date
- 28 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Sorrell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A McCulloch
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A McCulloch had been employed by the respondent since 1999 and, from 1 January 2020, worked part-time as a Project Assistant in the respondent's 'Baby Steps' initiative. In June 2020 the respondent decided to close the shop, and later correspondence and discussions referred to the possibility of the business being transferred to 'Baby Steps 20+' or, alternatively, staff being made redundant. The tribunal found that the claimant's employment transferred to 'Baby Steps 20+' with effect from 23 December 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Single TUPE claim under Regulation 15 for failure to elect appropriate representatives and to inform and consult under Regulations 13 and 14. | Upheld | — | £2,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,750
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
8 references- Regulation 13 TUPE Regs 2006
- Regulation 14 TUPE Regs 2006
- Regulation 15 TUPE Regs 2006
- Russell v Bacon's College
- Institution of Professional Civil Servants v SOS for Defence
- Sweetin v Coral Racing
- Susie Radin Ltd v GMB
- Todd v Strain
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.