Case 4107709/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107709/2019 Mr D Finlayson v Represented by Mr R Russell Solicitor McKenna Group and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107709/2019
- Decision date
- 12 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107709/2019 Mr D Finlayson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claims against the first, second and third respondents. Employment Judge Alexander Kemp therefore dismissed those claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual issues or any substantive findings on liability. It also does not record any remedy, because the claims were dismissed following withdrawal rather than determined on the merits. The judgment is dated 12 September 2019 and was sent to the parties on the same day.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims against the first, second and third respondents were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. It does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.