Case 4107712/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107712/2019 Ms A Martinez v Cashmere And Tartans Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107712/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107712/2019 Ms A Martinez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe found that Cashmere And Tartans Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms A Martinez's wages and ordered it to pay £486.30.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £453.42. The hearing listed for 27 September 2019 was cancelled. The judgment was entered in the register on 28 August 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages under rule 21 and ordered payment of £486.30. | Upheld | — | £486 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement under rule 21 and ordered payment of £453.42. | Upheld | — | £453 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £940
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.