Case 4107715/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107715/2019 Mr B White v Represented by: Mr C White Mitie Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107715/2019
- Decision date
- 20 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M MacLeod Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107715/2019 Mr B White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's claim was withdrawn and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No factual findings on the substance of the dispute are set out, and there is no merits determination recorded in the text provided.
The only outcome stated is dismissal following withdrawal. The judgment does not identify any remedy, award, or liability findings, and it does not contain any discussion of legal tests beyond the procedural rule relied on for dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013; no merits findings are stated. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013; no merits findings are stated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.