Case 4107744/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gerard Campbell v Represented by: Mr R Byrom Solicitor South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107744/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gerard Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment was a preliminary hearing in Mr Gerard Campbell's case against South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Trust. The issue for determination was whether he was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time of the alleged discriminatory acts. The respondent accepted that he had an impairment of stress and anxiety, but disputed that it had a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities.
The tribunal heard from Mr Campbell, his wife and Dr Millings, a Consultant Clinical and Counselling Psychologist. It accepted that Mr Campbell had experienced a series of personal and work-related stressors from 2016 onwards, that he was diagnosed with stress and anxiety in October 2017, and that he was prescribed Sertraline and saw Dr Millings in late 2017. The tribunal also accepted evidence that by the material period he had problems with sleep, concentration, memory, decision-making and confidence, and that he withdrew from some social situations and struggled with tasks such as writing reports, participating in meetings and engaging with employees.
Applying section 6 Equality Act 2010 and the approach in Goodwin v The Patent Office and Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd, the tribunal held that the claimant's impairment had a substantial effect because it was more than minor or trivial, and that it was long term because the effects had lasted at least 12 months and he remained on antidepressant medication. It also accepted Dr Millings' evidence that, if treatment were disregarded, the adverse effects would have been greater, and that there was a high likelihood of recurrence. The tribunal therefore found that Mr Campbell was disabled at the material time. This decision did not decide the merits of the underlying unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal or disability discrimination claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that Mr Campbell was a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 at the material time of the alleged discriminatory acts (21 December 2018, 22 March 2019, 3 April 2019 and 23 August 2019). It did not determine liability for the substantive unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal or discrimination claims in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Goodwin v The Patent Office
- Cruickshank v VAW Motorcast Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.