Case 4107750/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107750/2019 Mr C Georgiou v Represented by: Mr N A Largan, Solicitor Aiken Realisation Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107750/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107750/2019 Mr C Georgiou
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr C Georgiou’s claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not state the substantive nature of the claim beyond the case listing context, and it contains no findings on liability or remedy. It also records that Aiken Realisation Limited, formerly Aiken Group Limited, was in administration and that there was no appearance for the respondent.
The judgment is dated 6 January 2020 and was sent to the parties on 7 January 2020. No award or other monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The text does not specify the underlying claim type. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.