Case 4107762/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Tunn v South Lanarkshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107762/2014
- Decision date
- 28 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Tunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant had been given until 27 February 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing on that issue. The Tribunal found that the claimant had not provided an acceptable reason and had not requested a hearing, and therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Unlawful Deduction from Wages, but the judgment itself gives no particulars of the underlying claim beyond striking out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself gives no particulars of the underlying claim beyond striking out the claim for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.