Case 4107762/2020 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr J O’Hara v Represented by Ms D Flanigan - Solicitor XPO Supply Chain UK Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107762/2020
- Decision date
- 26 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr J O’Hara
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a Class 2 driver at the Livingston site, was employed from 11 February 2019 to 11 August 2020. His Addendum stated that drivers were entitled to shift allowances of £1.29 for 06:00 to 07:00, £1.92 for 18:00 to 22:00, £2.38 for 22:00 to 06:00, and £25.71 for night out. The tribunal read that wording in its natural and ordinary sense as conferring an entitlement to the hourly allowance for any part of a shift worked between 06:00 and 07:00, regardless of whether the shift began before 06:00.
The respondent relied on clause 12 of the contract and on a collective agreement, including a 2009 schedule said to amend the earlier site agreement. The tribunal accepted that the original 2007 collective agreement was capable of incorporation, but found that the 2009 schedule had not been communicated to the claimant during his employment, despite the agreement's own term that amendments would be fully communicated before any amendment became effective. On that basis, the purported amendment was not effective against the claimant.
The tribunal also held that, even if the 2009 schedule had been communicated, its wording did not clearly restrict the 06:00 to 07:00 allowance to drivers who started exactly at 06:00. Read with the collective agreement as a whole, including the statement that shift allowances would be paid pro rata for rostered basic shift hours worked, the bracketed note '(new shift allowance for drivers starting at 06.00 am)' was treated as describing the new allowance rather than imposing the limitation contended for by the respondent. The tribunal therefore found the claimant remained contractually entitled to the allowance and that the non-payment was an unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £336.72 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 ERA 1996 by not paying the shift allowance for time worked between 06:00 and 07:00 on shifts that started before 06:00. The award covered a series of deductions from February 2019 to August 2020 and was expressed gross. | Upheld | — | £337 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £337
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.24 ERA 1996
- ordinary contractual principles
- natural and ordinary meaning
- apt for incorporation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.