Case 4107771/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107771/2019 Ms L Young v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107771/2019
- Decision date
- 2 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M MacLeod Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107771/2019 Ms L Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms L Young brought a claim against Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited. The document does not set out factual allegations or tribunal findings on the substance of the claim.
The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim, having been withdrawn by the claimant, is dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment text does not separately describe the unfair dismissal claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim, having been withdrawn by the claimant, is dismissed under Rule 52. The judgment text does not separately describe the disability discrimination claim. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.