Case 4107776/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107776/2019 Mr G Ivanov v Scott Learmonth — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107776/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107776/2019 Mr G Ivanov
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe decided the case without a hearing and cancelled the listed hearing on 11 October 2019.
The tribunal upheld two claims. First, it found that Scott Learmonth had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr G Ivanov's wages and ordered payment of £1,750. Second, it found that Mr Ivanov had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £250. The judgment does not set out further reasoning beyond those findings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £1,750. | Upheld | — | £1,750 |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The claimant was found to have been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and was awarded £250 in damages. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.