Case 4107785/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107785/2024 Held in Inverness on & December 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr Jason Allan v Department for Work and Pensions — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107785/2024
- Decision date
- 16 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107785/2024 Held in Inverness on & December 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr Jason Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was previously found to be disabled for the purposes of s.6(1) of the Equality Act 2010 because of left-side abdominal pain from January 2019 and back left-side pain from February 2022. The merits hearing concerned alleged failures to make reasonable adjustments relating to equipment and working arrangements: an adapted chair when working in Buckie, a monitor arm, and microbreaks or diary adjustments.
For the Buckie period, the Tribunal found there had been a clear failure to provide an appropriate desk and chair while the claimant worked there, and said the claim would likely have succeeded if brought in time. It dismissed the claim because it was out of time by some months and the claimant had not persuaded the Tribunal that it was just and equitable to extend time.
On the monitor arm, the Tribunal accepted that the need to input data and check records on a monitor was a PCP and that the lack of a monitor arm put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage once the respondent was alerted to the issue in August 2024. It found the respondent addressed the issue once raised and that the claimant had not shown the respondent knew before 2024 that a monitor arm was required as a reasonable adjustment.
On microbreaks, the Tribunal found the requirement to see appointments through the day was a PCP that placed the claimant at a substantial disadvantage. It accepted there were teething problems with the diary system, but concluded the respondent took reasonable steps to implement microbreaks as quickly as it could in the circumstances, and the claimant accepted that by November 2024 the system was working well and he felt supported.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments by providing an office chair suitable for the claimant's disability when working in Buckie from January 2024 until May 2024 was dismissed as out of time; the Tribunal was not convinced it was just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to provision of an extendable monitor arm was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments in relation to adjustment of the claimant's diary and implementation and provision of microbreaks from August 2024 onwards was dismissed as not well founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.6(1) Equality Act 2010
- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link 2003 IRLR 434
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.