Case 4107788/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Airline Pilots’ Association v - Barrister Loganair Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4107788/2019
- Decision date
- 16 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker British
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Airline Pilots’ Association
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 arising from BMIR's administration. The tribunal rejected the case that there had been a carefully choreographed transfer beginning in 2018, accepting that BMIR was in financial difficulty and that Loganair had undertaken contingency planning, but finding that the earlier transactions involving aircraft, stock, engineering resources and training were explained by the companies' relationship and BMIR's need for support rather than by a pre-planned transfer scheme.
Applying the multifactorial approach in Cheesman and Spijkers, the tribunal held that the whole of BMIR's business was an economic entity and that it transferred to Loganair when BMIR went into administration. It found that the business was a scheduled airline operation involving aircraft, pilots, other staff, bases and routes, and that Loganair had acquired the practical ability to continue that business by taking over most of the leased aircraft, a substantial majority of the UK-based pilots, some other staff, level 3 airport slots, the Aberdeen hangar, iPads, and certain contracts including Airbus and Eastern Airways. The tribunal accepted that not all routes, bookings, customers or European operations transferred, but held that the activities before and after were broadly similar and that the business retained its identity.
The tribunal fixed the transfer date as 17 February 2019, when the majority of the aircraft were transferred and offers of employment were made to pilots. It said that the business had been integrated into Loganair, but that this did not prevent a relevant transfer. The tribunal did not decide the time bar issue or the contingent individual claims at this hearing, and indicated that further procedure would be required, including consideration of remedy if the claims proceeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Preliminary issue under regulation 15(1)(c) TUPER. The tribunal held that there was a relevant transfer of BMIR's business to Loganair under regulation 3(1)(a) and fixed the transfer date as 17 February 2019. No final determination was made at this hearing of the contingent individual claims, time bar, or remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- regulation 3(1)(a) TUPER
- regulation 3(2) TUPER
- regulation 3(6) TUPER
- Cheesman v R Brewer Contracts Ltd
- Spijkers v Gebroeders Benedik Abattoir CV
- CELTEC Ltd v Astley
- Ferreira da Silva e Brito v Estado Portugues
- Suzen v Zehnacker Gebaudereinigung GmbH
- Longden v Ferrari Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.