Case 4107802/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Damian Zaborowski v Represented by: K Gilmore – Lay Representative Interpreter:15 M Szydlowska Ryszard Nowakowski — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107802/2019
- Decision date
- 10 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Damian Zaborowski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rory McPherson heard the case in Glasgow on 2 December 2019. Oral reasons were given at the hearing. The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and awarded £204.60.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars and awarded £262.00 for that claim. The judgment records that both sums were payable immediately to the claimant.
The remainder of the claimant's claims against the respondent, including the unlawful deduction from wages claim, were dismissed. The total amount awarded by the judgment was therefore £466.60.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid accrued holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeds in the sum of £204.60. | Upheld | — | £205 |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars succeeds and awards £262.00. This claim does not map neatly to the locked taxonomy. | Upheld | — | £262 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the remainder of the claimant's claims, including the unlawful deduction from wages claim, are dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £467
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.