Case 4107813/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Courtney v BXL Ltd t/a Brass Monkey Grange and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107813/2022
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms C Courtney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Courtney worked for GRTL at No 1 the Grange from 15 November 2021 until about 6 June 2022, then for BXL Ltd t/a Brass Monkey Grange from 18 July 2022 until 24 August 2022, when she resigned. She claimed £157.50 for unpaid wages for 15.75 hours worked in the week commencing 30 May 2022 and holiday pay said to be £854.67 before credit, reduced to £598.47 after a payment of £256.20.
The tribunal dismissed the unpaid wages claim. It found the relevant deduction date was 7 June 2022 and that the claimant did not begin ACAS Early Conciliation until 13 November 2022, after the three-month time limit had expired on 6 September 2022, so s.207B ERA 1996 did not extend time. The tribunal rejected the argument that the wages claim could be linked as part of a series with the later holiday pay claim, because the two deductions were not sufficiently similar. It accepted that the claimant had genuinely misunderstood the limitation position, but held that the mistake was not reasonable because she knew of the right to complain, had not sought free advice, and had not been misled.
The holiday pay claim was also dismissed on the merits. Applying TUPE reg 3(1)(a) and the Spijkers and Cheesman approach, the tribunal accepted that some employees and some premises assets continued, but held that the economic entity did not retain its identity after the respondent took over the premises. The tribunal relied on the month-long closure and refurbishment, the change in branding to Brass Monkey the Grange, the shift in customer base, the altered menu and pricing, the move away from table service towards counter service, and changes to lighting, music and opening hours. It therefore held that liabilities for holiday accrued during employment with GRTL did not transfer to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for £157.50 for 15.75 hours worked in the week commencing 30 May 2022. Dismissed because the tribunal found it was presented out of time, ACAS Early Conciliation was not started before the three-month limit expired, and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued untaken holiday pay, pursued as £598.47 after credit for a £256.20 payment. Dismissed because the tribunal found there was no relevant transfer under TUPE, so liabilities for holiday pay accrued during employment with GRTL did not transfer to the respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
14 references- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
- series of deductions test
- TUPE reg 3(1)(a)
- Spijkers factors
- Cheesman factors
- Pearce v Bank of America Merrill Lynch
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy
- Wall's Meat Ltd v Khan
- Dedman v British Building and Engineering Appliances Ltd
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Gaines v Picturedrome Theatres Limited
- Foreningen Af Arbedjsledere I Danmark v Daddy's Dance Hall A/S
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.