Case 4107819/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107819/2019 Mr C Hynes v Represented by: Ms K Farrell Solicitor Jewson Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107819/2019
- Decision date
- 4 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4107819/2019 Mr C Hynes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant, Mr C Hynes, was represented by Ms K Farrell, Solicitor, and the respondent, Jewson Limited, was represented by Ms S Copson, Solicitor. The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type beyond referring to it as “the claim”.
The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and therefore was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or legal test are set out in the extracted text.
Employment Judge Ian McFatridge signed the judgment on 04 October 2019, and it was sent to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type in the extracted text. It states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.