Case 4107823/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Laing v Kingsmills Hotel (Inverness) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107823/2019
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Inverness
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Laing
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 11 December 2019, Employment Judge A Kemp considered whether Miss K Laing had the continuous service needed to bring an unfair dismissal claim under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent said there was a break in continuity between 8 April 2017 and 1 July 2017; the claimant said she had remained on the books and had worked on 28 May 2017 and 11 June 2017. The tribunal accepted evidence that she had started work on 7 September 2015, moved to more regular work and bar supervisor duties in about May 2016, and had resigned on 17 March 2017 to take another full-time job.
The tribunal found that the claimant's employment ended on 8 April 2017 when the respondent processed her resignation, issued a P45 and paid accrued wages and holiday pay. Although it accepted that she worked on 28 May 2017 and 11 June 2017, the tribunal held that there were gaps of more than six weeks, then more than a week, and then more than two weeks with no work, so continuity was broken under section 210 ERA 1996 and the essential mutuality of obligation was missing. As continuous service therefore began only on 1 July 2017, the claimant did not have the two years' service required for unfair dismissal, and that claim was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The breach of contract claim was allowed to proceed to a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant did not have the two years' continuous service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal held that continuity was broken after the claimant resigned in March 2017 and by later gaps in work before 1 July 2017. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.210 ERA 1996
- s.108 ERA 1996
- mutuality of obligation
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.