Case 4107823/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4107823/2021 Ms E Krejci v Tayside Contracts Dundee City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107823/2021
- Decision date
- 13 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Kemp Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4107823/2021 Ms E Krejci
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 25 September 2025 the tribunal wrote to Ms E Krejci giving her an opportunity to provide written reasons by 9 October 2025, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out because she had not responded to earlier correspondence about the claim. The judgment records that she did not respond to that letter.
Because there was no response, Employment Judge S Kemp struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d). The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.