Case 4107832/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss V Pikturnaite v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107832/2019
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Miss V Pikturnaite
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant did not attend the Glasgow hearing on 9 October 2019 and had not responded to the tribunal's letters or telephone contact attempts after her solicitors had withdrawn. In those circumstances, and having regard to the claim form and response, Employment Judge R Gall dismissed the claimant's claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The tribunal then heard evidence from Fiona Clacher, a director of the respondent, on the employer contract claim. The documentary evidence included the employment contract signed by the claimant on 6 October 2016. The tribunal found that the claimant had started work in July 2015, completed a two-year apprenticeship in October 2017, and became a hairdresser on completion of that training. Clause 19 of the contract provided for repayment of training fees if an employee left within two years of completing training.
The tribunal found that the claimant left without notice on 2 October 2019, which was within the two-year period. The training fees were found to be £1,100, based on the respondent's contribution of £10 per week towards training costs, with the balance met by Skills Development Scotland. The tribunal ordered repayment of that sum.
On notice, clause 18 required four weeks' notice of termination. The tribunal found that the claimant gave no notice, that there were appointments in the notice period which had to be cancelled or covered, and that the respondent lost income of £1,085. After deducting £800 of wages that did not have to be paid, the tribunal assessed the respondent's net loss at £285. The claimant was ordered to pay £1,385 in total. The respondent also applied for expenses, and the tribunal fixed 2 December 2019 for consideration of that application; no expenses award was determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claimant did not appear or respond to tribunal communications, and the claim was dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment does not specify the substantive type of the claimant's own claim in the text provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The employer contract claim succeeded. The tribunal ordered the claimant to pay £1,385, made up of £1,100 training costs and £285 for the respondent's net loss from the claimant leaving without notice. | Upheld | — | £1,385 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,385
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 ET Rules 2013
- Rule 84 ET Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.