Case 4107846/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107846/2020 Miss C Johnston v Jackies Hair Salon — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107846/2020
- Decision date
- 15 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107846/2020 Miss C Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented to the claim. The Employment Judge decided the case on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 17 February 2021.
The tribunal held that Miss C Johnston had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £3,139.20. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,400.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,025. The judgment does not record any separate award structure beyond those three sums, and the aggregate total from the amounts stated is £7,564.20.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,139.20. | Upheld | — | £3,139 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,400. | Upheld | — | £3,400 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,025. | Upheld | — | £1,025 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,564
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.