Case 4107853/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Milton & Stirling Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107853/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Neilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr B Williams, started work for Milton & Stirling Limited on 28 January 2020 as a debt advisor in the respondent's Manchester office. He was paid a salary of £17,500 per annum, was not given a written statement of terms and conditions, and the tribunal found his holiday entitlement was 28 days per year including bank holidays. The issues were whether the respondent had breached the contract by failing to give one week's notice of termination, and whether there was any accrued holiday pay due under regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
On the notice issue, the tribunal rejected the respondent's case that a termination letter dated 14 September 2020 had been issued. It accepted the claimant's evidence that he was notified by WhatsApp on 28 September 2020 that the Manchester office was being closed with immediate effect, and it found that the more likely explanation was that the office manager had not issued the letter. The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice under section 86(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, that no such notice was given, and that this amounted to a breach of contract. It awarded 5 days' lost wages, calculated from a weekly gross pay figure of £336.54, in the sum of £240.38.
On holiday pay, the tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence that he had not taken any annual leave before 28 September 2020. It found, on the basis of the evidence before it and the unreliable record-keeping in the Manchester office, that he had taken the bank holidays but no annual leave, leaving 13 days of accrued holiday due on termination. Applying regulation 14(3) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal calculated the amount due as £875 gross, subject to tax and national insurance. The judgment therefore records two successful claims and a total gross award of £1,115.38.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent failed to give the claimant one week's notice under section 86(1) ERA 1996. It held that, had notice been given, employment would have ended on 5 October 2020, and awarded 5 days' lost wages at £240.38 gross. | Upheld | — | £240 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to 28 days' holiday per year inclusive of bank holidays, accepted that he had not taken annual leave before 28 September 2020, and found 13 days accrued holiday due. It calculated the payment under regulation 14(3) WTR 1998 at £875 gross. | Upheld | — | £875 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 86(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- regulation 14(2) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14(3) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.