Case 4107891/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107891/2014 & others Mr I MacLeod & others v Albion Automotive Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107891/2014
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107891/2014 & others Mr I MacLeod & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns a multiple schedule of claims against Albion Automotive Limited, including case 4107891/2014 and related cases listed on the judgment sheet. The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
The formal disposal was dismissal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive merits findings are recorded in the judgment text, and no compensation or other monetary award is stated.
The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Robert Gall on 27 September 2019 and sent to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Multiple Schedule 7169 claims against Albion Automotive Limited were listed together. The judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.