Case 4107898/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Y Kilkie v , Solicitor Lookers Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107898/2020
- Decision date
- 19 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Y Kilkie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remote preliminary hearing before Employment Judge I McFatridge on 10 May 2021. The claimant was Ms Y Kilkie and the respondent was Lookers Limited. The judgment records a single procedural ruling rather than a merits decision on the underlying claims.
The tribunal granted the respondent's application that the email between the respondent and the claimant's solicitors dated 15 October 2020, relating to the matter referred to in paragraph 8(f) of the claimant's ET1, was inadmissible. Oral reasons were given at the hearing. No other findings, liability decisions, or remedy awards are recorded in the extracted judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal determined a preliminary evidential application only: the respondent's application that an email dated 15 October 2020 between the respondent and the claimant's solicitors, relating to the matter referred to in paragraph 8(f) of the ET1, was inadmissible. No substantive discrimination or unfair dismissal claim was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.