Case 4107959/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McCrudden v Mr D Chowdhury — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107959/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J McCrudden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew the claims at the hearing. It therefore dismissed the claims said to arise from the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Modern Slavery Act 2015, the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006, the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, protected disclosures under s47 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and ordinary unfair dismissal under s94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, in terms of Rule 52 of the 2013 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
No merits findings or remedy assessment were made. The reasons section contains only the statement that the claimant withdrew the claims at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim said to arise from the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim said to arise from the Modern Slavery Act 2015; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim said to arise from the Animal Health and Welfare (Scotland) Act 2006; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim said to arise from the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Claim based on protected disclosures under s47 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Ordinary unfair dismissal claim under s94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal recorded that it was withdrawn at the hearing and dismissed in terms of Rule 52. | Withdrawn |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 52 of the 2013 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
- s47 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- s94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.