Case 4107997/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4107997/2019 Mr A Johnston v Culbokie, Dingwall Wipro Ltd st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4107997/2019
- Decision date
- 15 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Hendry
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge J M Hendry Case No: 4107997/2019 Mr A Johnston
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment records only that Mr A Johnston's claim was withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, Employment Judge J M Hendry dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings on the substantive merits of the dispute, liability, or remedy are recorded in the extracted text. The judgment also does not set out the nature of the underlying claim beyond the case listing information supplied separately for extraction purposes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. It records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.