Case 4108026/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shonagh Howe v Represented by: Margaret Coleman Lay Representative Leisure and Culture Dundee — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108026/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B. Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shonagh Howe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Shonagh Howe was employed by Leisure and Culture Dundee from 10 April 2017 as a lifeguard at Olympia Leisure Centre. She later became a casual member of staff, worked variable shifts, and between 6 April 2019 and 5 April 2020 was paid an average of £792 per month. The issue before the tribunal was whether she was entitled to arrears of pay from March 2020 under an unlawful deduction from wages complaint.
The tribunal found that on 22 April 2020 the respondent wrote to the claimant proposing furlough under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme from 24 March 2020, explaining that her agreement to work on a casual basis would continue but that she would not be required to work and would be paid 100% of her average earnings for January to March 2020. The claimant signed and returned the letter on 23 April 2020, and the tribunal found that this amounted to an agreed variation of her contract backdated to 24 March 2020. It also found that, if she had declined the furlough arrangement, she would have received no pay at all during periods when she was not assigned work.
The claimant argued that the furlough calculation should not have been based on the respondent's three-month average and that the agreement was not valid. The tribunal rejected that case, finding no basis to imply a contractual term requiring a different method of calculation and holding that the express terms agreed in the furlough letter governed the pay due. It noted that the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme was a matter between the employer and HMRC and did not itself create a right for the claimant to enforce a different calculation under section 23 of the ERA 1996.
The tribunal concluded that the respondent had made all payments properly payable to the claimant from 24 March 2020 onwards. It therefore held that no pay arrears were due and dismissed the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages in the sum of £7,540.93.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay from March 2020, pleaded as unlawful deduction from wages under s.13 ERA 1996, was dismissed. The claimant claimed £7,540.93, but the tribunal found the furlough arrangement agreed on 23 April 2020 governed what was properly payable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27(1) ERA 1996
- s.230 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.