Case 4108074/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr George McNaught v S&A Kilcoyne Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108074/2021
- Decision date
- 2 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr George McNaught
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr George McNaught was unfairly dismissed by S&A Kilcoyne Limited. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the end of the hearing and that neither party requested written reasons.
No compensation was awarded. The tribunal said that a fair procedure would also have led to dismissal on the same date, so it would not be just and equitable to make any compensatory award. It also reduced both the basic award and the compensatory award by 100% to zero because of the claimant's contributory conduct.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. It awarded no compensation because it found that a fair procedure would also have led to dismissal on the same date, and it reduced both the basic and compensatory awards by 100% to zero because of the claimant's contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £0 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.