Case 4108102/2022 · Employment Tribunal
of Scotland Ltd v – Counsel [Instructed by — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108102/2022
- Decision date
- 2 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Lees
Parties
2 namedClaimant
of Scotland Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningHMRC served a Notice of Underpayment on 22 November 2022 in relation to the claimant's holiday savings fund, which was operated for employees over many years. Employees joined voluntarily, authorised deductions from net wages through payroll, and could withdraw their accumulated savings on request. The parties agreed that the first issue was whether those deductions were for the claimant's own use and benefit within regulation 12(1) of the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015.
The tribunal held that the deductions were not for the claimant's own use and benefit. It accepted that the claimant held the money in its current account and may have obtained incidental interest or cash-flow advantage, but found those were consequences of the arrangement rather than its purpose. Objectively, the deductions were directed by employees to create savings that were contractually repayable on demand, so they were treated as delayed wages rather than deductions made for the employer's benefit. The tribunal distinguished the authorities it discussed, including Leisure Employment and Middlesbrough FC, on the basis that those cases involved deductions that directly discharged or funded an employer-side liability or benefit.
Because the first issue was decided in the claimant's favour, the enforcement notice was rescinded. The tribunal nonetheless addressed the claimant's alternative section 17 National Minimum Wage Act 1998 argument for completeness. It concluded that, if the first issue had gone the other way, payments from the Fund could in principle amount to additional remuneration and would be applied against the earliest outstanding pay reference periods first, but that alternative analysis did not affect the outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Appeal against HMRC Notice of Underpayment under section 19 of the National Minimum Wage Act 1998; the tribunal rescinded the notice. The tribunal also considered, for completeness, an alternative section 17 NMWA 1998 argument about additional remuneration. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- purposive approach
- regulation 12(1) National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015
- section 17 National Minimum Wage Act 1998
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Leisure Employment Services Ltd [2006] ICR 1094
- Revenue and Customs v Middlesbrough FC 2020 ICR 1404
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.