Case 4108204/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Crozier v Represented by: Herself Reem Gleam Cleaning Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108204/2022
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Crozier
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a cleaner and was paid £540 net each month. The tribunal found that the respondent stopped paying her after July 2022 and that she remained ready, willing and able to work. The respondent did not attend the hearing and did not defend the claims.
Applying section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal held that the non-payment amounted to a continuing series of deductions from wages because the claimant was contractually due 10 months' wages and had not been paid. It therefore declared that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal ordered payment of £5,400 net, being 10 months at £540 each, with any deductions required by law to be made before payment of the net sum. The judgment records that the remaining claims were withdrawn after it became clear that the claimant had not been dismissed; the reasons identify those claims as including redundancy, holiday pay and unfair dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a continuing series of deductions because the respondent did not pay 10 months' wages at £540 net per month after July 2022. The award was the net sum of £5,400. | Upheld | — | £5,400 |
| Redundancy | Recorded as one of the remaining claims withdrawn after it became clear the claimant had not been dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded as one of the remaining claims withdrawn after it became clear the claimant had not been dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not in fact been dismissed, and this claim formed part of the remaining claims that were withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,400
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.