Case 4108210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Macrae v Café Ceardach Ltd. Private Limited Company — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108210/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Macrae
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short consent judgment made under Rule 64 by Employment Judge M Robison. The tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mrs M Macrae, was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £720, notice pay of £480 net, and holiday pay of £600 net.
The judgment also stated that the claimant’s claim was limited to those sums and that the respondent accepted that the payments were due. No contested findings of fact or merits reasoning were set out, and no separate liability issues were determined beyond the agreed entitlement to the listed amounts.
The total monetary figure flowing from the judgment is £1,800. The judgment does not identify any additional award for basic award, compensatory award, interest, or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment made by consent under Rule 64. The claimant was held entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £720, and the respondent accepted the payment was due. | Settled | — | £720 |
| Breach of contract | Judgment made by consent under Rule 64. The claimant was held entitled to notice pay of £480 net, and the respondent accepted the payment was due. | Settled | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment made by consent under Rule 64. The claimant was held entitled to holiday pay of £600 net, and the respondent accepted the payment was due. | Settled | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.