Case 4108293/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108293/2018 Mr P Neeson v Harpercollins Publishers Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4108293/2018
- Decision date
- 23 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4108293/2018 Mr P Neeson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is very short. It records that Mr P Neeson brought a claim against Harpercollins Publishers Limited, but the text supplied does not state the underlying complaint or any findings on the merits.
The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded or addressed in the extracted text.
The judgment is dated 23 August 2018 and is entered by Employment Judge Wiseman. No lay members are listed in the extracted text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive cause of action; it only records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.