Case 4108391/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Lyall v Oceaneering International Services Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4108391/2014
- Decision date
- 6 June 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Lyall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr S Lyall's claim under rule 37 of the Rules in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 18 May 2017 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 1 June 2017, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. No remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37 for not being actively pursued; the PDF text does not set out the substantive Working Time Regulations issue. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.